Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The quality seems pretty nice on this badge that I acquired from an old collection.  Would appreciate any input.112.JPG.cb359ba99e969dab9732d5f4cb0dd84e.JPG113.JPG.8e598e64f62bf87be18c474094316d79.JPG114.JPG.98d9d9925685351cd14eaba17d32aa54.JPG115.JPG.43fd2b6ee663888df57d100a4a4225ef.JPG

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Thanks Jeff.  Is it a known fake or are their some things you look for that flag this one?

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I am not exactly sure but I believe this is known as the cyclops fake due to the big eye in the eagle, The overall design is nothing like a Juncker badge and is more like a Schwerin design. A huge red flag is the maker mark which the style of the letters is incorrect for a Juncker made product. Also, even though Juncker made u-boat badges I do not believe they were maker marked. Hope this helps.

Jeff

Posted
On 2/6/2021 at 4:14 PM, Jeff V. said:

I am not exactly sure but I believe this is known as the cyclops fake due to the big eye in the eagle, The overall design is nothing like a Juncker badge and is more like a Schwerin design. A huge red flag is the maker mark which the style of the letters is incorrect for a Juncker made product. Also, even though Juncker made u-boat badges I do not believe they were maker marked. Hope this helps.

Jeff

It does help alot.  Thank you very much sir.

Posted
On 2/6/2021 at 4:37 PM, donnol said:

looks to good to be a fake

Yes, it is very nice looking but I guess the details and inconsistencies of the markings are red flags as Jeff points out.  Really takes a lot of study not to end up with a fake. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...