Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don’t know anything about it, just looking for opinions about originality. Thanks!

23CF8FB1-B6F4-4545-9B5C-D366E1918E66.jpeg

CA8ADC78-1273-449D-AA1F-5B2043BA0720.jpeg

FADB32BC-A5CA-455A-9B74-B168C91C4679.jpeg

FDB265D9-1EC6-4985-9672-8E599D1E2FED.jpeg

165CB70F-2B49-4BE7-BE40-453EFE6B0C9B.jpeg

CA317069-15E0-40D0-9F4E-4FD0F1654544.jpeg

Posted

I have one opinion that the maker mark for Juncker is wrong. 
Here are three reportedly original marks followed by the one on this badge. Note how the “C.E.” is spaced out and not crowded. 

3AB7BD9D-2908-45E6-A73A-B1C38132D970.jpeg

175B8871-1B54-4113-BFCA-277254AF16F8.jpeg

556B7FBB-CCA1-4CB2-9DF0-F2DCAA9059A9.jpeg

1647E0B7-9B8F-43F6-97A3-5C24C66E4A6B.png

Posted

I think a majority of the fakes found will use this famous Maker's hallmark. Have seen this maker on numerous fake badges over the years. Dave

Posted

One other thing that I notice is that the swastika is not square.  The left hand (as viewed) arm of the swastika is shorter than the others.  

Posted
24 minutes ago, SARGE said:

One other thing that I notice is that the swastika is not square.  The left hand (as viewed) arm of the swastika is shorter than the others.  

 

It sure is, thanks!

Posted

As this one appears to have been produced to deceive new collectors, I would place it in the category of “museum quality reproductions”. The ones I typically see are not as nicely detailed or marked. Thanks for the comments! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...